Big Thief’s “Shark Smile” participates in a specific,
venerable tradition of alternative/college/indie/art-rock: the rambling,
incongruous, discordant, and even borderline off-putting instrumental intro
that precedes a catchy or even “pop” song recorded by artists who otherwise
courted an identity as “edgy” or “innovative.” “Sweet Jane”; “100%”; “Star Sign”;
“Cannonball”; “Texas Never Whispers”; “Corona”. That’s a killer mixtape right
there if you happen to dig the music of well-read white people who dress
poorly.
Now, obviously, there are differences of degree and even
kind in that list. The “Corona” intro is a quick hit of tension that releases
when the song kicks into gear. The intro to “Sweet Jane” is pleasantly boring.
The intro to “Star Sign” is unpleasantly boring at great length. And the intro
to “Texas Never Whispers” will cause you actual physical pain if you’re wearing
headphones. But in all of those cases, if you stick around, you get to hear one
of the catchier songs by the artist in question.
Perhaps this maneuver is done to signal seriousness—after all,
The Beatles never did rambling intros when they wanted to hold your hand, but once
they were serious artistes they couldn’t resist an occasional prelude. Or maybe bands just
want to punish the listener for having the audacity to skip right to the catchy
song.
The more recent example of Big Thief, though, makes me
consider another possibility specific to the streaming age, which is that the
discordant intro is a tactic to scare away any listener who would skip the song
after hearing the first five seconds on a Spotify playlist.[1]
A streaming service is certainly how I discovered this song—it’s really how I
discover any interesting music these days, since Brookside is not exactly the epicenter
of KC youth culture. Regardless, I’m glad I stuck around, because once “Shark
Smile” got past the intro, it sunk its teeth into
me as much as anything else I’ve heard this decade.[2]
At its core, it’s a lovers-in-a-car song. Closer inspection
of the lyrics reveals it to be a lovers-speeding-toward-death song which also
includes a vampire who might or might not be metaphorical. But I don’t know
that the lyrics matter much in their specifics beyond their ability to convey
in a few deft word-clouds the image of an object of desire flickering in the passing
headlights. The object of desire in this case seems to be someone named Evelyn.
She and the speaker are flooring it through the upper midwest. They smile; they
glance; they kiss; there’s a pile of money on the dashboard; there’s a wreck in
the final verse. Things lead, as they do, to a chorus, and that chorus, as in
any good song about desire, is baldly straightforward: “She said oh baby take
me/ and I said oh baby take me too.” It isn’t Keats, but then again, Keats and
Fanny Brawne never drove around in a Nissan hatchback listening to Morrissey.
It’s a truism to say that rock music would never have
existed without sex, cars, death, sex in cars, death in cars, or sex and death
in cars.[3]
But most of the automotive-lust rock canon does a staggeringly poor job at conveying
the actual fraught hesitations and discomfiting upwellings of desire that
accompany the experience of being strongly attracted to someone who is sitting
next to you in the very small space of a vehicle. Meatloaf, Poison, Van Halen, Elastica,
R Kelly, Bob Seger—that’s a first pass at a sex-in-car rock canon, and while I like
several of those songs (even the Poison one!), and am morally appalled by a couple listed artists (not just R. Kelly!), there is not much effort in
those tracks to convey fraught hesitation. Springsteen at his very best can
pull it off—and Big Thief singer/songwriter Adrianne Lenker has mentioned Nebraska in particular as an influence
on “Shark Smile”—but Springsteen on Nebraska
is, in all the best ways, an outlier.
“Shark Smile” conveys lust and hesitation far more with its
instrumental tones than with its lyrics. The rhythm section in particular is
insistent but gentle all at once. A fairly strummy guitar asserts and then
withholds at various points before a more chaotic electric guitar line crescendos
to take the end of the song towards a concluding chaos that evokes, like any
tilting toward the sublime, lust and death inseparably. Lenker’s vocal
performance is by turns alien and caressing, whispery and growling. She has one
of those voices that is initially a bit off-putting in its lack of polish,
until she sinks her hooks in and suddenly the idea of listening to rock music
performed by a merely beautiful voice seems actively obscene. Put all the
elements of “Shark Smile” together, and it somehow sounds to this old guy’s
memory like being seventeen and driving around town, unsure of yourself and
overwhelmed by yourself, with no particular place to go.
The fatal conclusion of the song is a nice bit of
fragmentary melodrama. Bonnie and Clyde or Thelma and Louise come to mind, but
that doesn’t quite fit inasmuch as all four of those characters die, whereas the
narrator of “Shark Smile” seems to be alive to hear Evelyn’s last words (which
are, of course, the chorus). In this way, “Shark Smile” riffs on the much more
maudlin pop subgenre of songs about teen romance interrupted by vehicular
death, headlined by the likes of “Teen Angel” and “Last Kiss.” And say what you
will about “Teen Angel,” but it understands that teenage desire is so
terrifying, eruptive, overwhelming, and shameful that its enormity can only
find an objective correlative in the image of a sixteen-year-old girl getting
hit by a mother-fucking train.
I’ve thus far avoided dwelling on the fact
that “Shark Smile” is a song in which a woman sings about a woman, largely
because I didn’t want to come across as suggesting that the song’s apparent
queerness is what makes it interesting.[4]
Indeed, its queerness doesn’t make it
interesting, or at least it doesn’t make it novel—Tracy Chapman wrote a hit driving song thirty years ago. I also wanted to avoid getting all
male-gazey about it. But I will hazard that Lenker’s lyrical stew of same-sex
desire, outlaw imagery, and rural setting creates an air of reticence, stealth,
and even dread that is echoed in the steady drone of the guitar, and also in the
way that the framing dissonance of the song is at war with its catchiness.
At the end of the last sentence I talked myself into
liking the intro. What can I say? It’s a very good song. Perhaps the point of
close reading is to make ourselves like the things we don’t like about the
things we love.
[1] I
should note that Big Thief’s Adrianne Lenker, who wrote the song, says that the
intro “foreshadow(s) the turmoil that happens in the song.” That’s clever, and
the part of me that believes that a rock song can be an urn well-wrought as any
Donne sonnet is willing to go there. However, the part of me that commutes to
Warrensburg usually wishes they’d just get to the first verse already. https://www.npr.org/2017/11/26/565921721/big-thiefs-shark-smile-is-a-rocking-road-song-ending-in-tragedy
[2]
One nice thing about blogging is that I don’t have to listen to the editor who
would rightly insist that I remove that pun.
[3] I
might be stretching the definition of “truism.”
[4]
All of this is assuming that “the speaker” of the song is a woman, which is by
no means a definitive reading.
I’ve been washing myself in this song lately. Mostly, though, I read this post and think: Jesus, this motherfucker can write like a goddamn shark smile.
ReplyDelete